IELTS MASTER | IELTS Writing Test 98

IELTS Writing Test 98

Cambridge IELTS Tests 1 to 13

Task 1: The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words.

Task 2: Some people want the government to spend more money for looking life on other planets, however others think it is waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth that the government should be solving. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Cambridge IELTS Tests 1 to 13

4 responses to “IELTS Writing Test 98”

  1. Rekha Soni says:

    The pie chart reveals the ratio of a survey of visitors who visited several tourists places in Britain in 1999.

    Overall, the ratio of blackpool pleasure beach constituted the major part of the tourists’ places , while the ratio of other places was less in Britain in 1999.

    According to the pie chart, the percentage of blackpool pleasure beach accounted for just under two quarter of visitors’ places. Furthermore , the ratio of Alton tower was 17% and experienced a decrease of 1% in pleasureland and Southport. Moreover, the contribution by chessington world of adventures and legoland, Windsor remained relatively constant at one tenth .

    As per the chart, the proportion of theme parks comprised of 38% and the ratio of museum and galleries reduced by 1% points. In addition, a difference of 7% was apparent in the percentage of wildlife parks and zoos and in historic houses and monuments.

    • IELTS MASTER says:

      You have interpreted the data wrong. Blackpool percentage is part of 38% of tourists who visited theme parks and not the overall tourists who visited various sites in Britain. You had to write two paragraphs one on the overall percentage from the pie chart and the second paragraph giving the break up of tourists who visited only theme parks and which theme parks they visited.

  2. Rekha Soni says:

    There is no doubt that the expenditure of space research is high.While it is believed that , the government should deal with current issues on the earth, others advocate that it is worthwhile to pour money for space research. But I support the former notion and both views will be discussed in the following section.

    To commence with, the government should emphasize on saving nonrenewable sources. Since energy sources such as petrol and dieasel cannot be caused again , the future of our grandchildren cannot be imagined. Furthermore, everyday plenty of people use these sources and do not bother about the future generation. Secondly, the number of vehicles is increasing drastically across the globe which creates air and noise pollution, the smoke of carbon dioxide affects the global warming.Therefore, the government should immediately mitigate these issues as the day is not far when our big planet earth will become a boiling pot. To illustrate, all factories dispose waste into the lake and river.Consequently, every year several species of animals die and if animals die , our ecological chain will collapse.

    However, a certain section of the society believes that, space research is necessary for finding living space. Moreover, it is good to spend money in space rearch and find accommodation on another planet because many difficulties are faced on the earth and due to pollution the survival of individuals will not be possible.

    To recapitulate, although survival of individuals can be found by space research, the government should alleviate current issues to spend life on the earth like reduce pollution and save petrol and dieasel which are threats for the human life.

    • IELTS MASTER says:

      spelling of diesel is wrong. ‘Since energy sources such as petrol and dieasel cannot be caused again’ not caused but generated quickly. ‘although survival of individuals can be found by space research’ you cannot find survival because survival is not an object which you can find. ‘alleviate current issues to spend life’ not spend but improve life. ‘save petrol and dieasel which are threats for the human life’ this is a contradicting statement, on one side you are saying to save petrol and diesel and then you say these are threats, you do not save threats you eliminate threats.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *